Dont Ever Call Me Leprechaun Again Movie
Far from gold origins
Despite not caring all that much for the previous 'Leprechaun' films, 'Leprechaun: Origins' was nonetheless watched anyway equally a franchise completest (significant seeing all the films). Plus part of me was semi-intrigued, but also quite nervous about, past it not having Warwick Davis, the all-time affair consistently about the 'Leprechaun' films bar none, in the title role.
Seeing it, not just does 'Leprechaun: Origins' brand pretty much all the mistakes the previous films did it amplifies them and makes more forth the way. It has been said by many that 'Leprechaun: Origins' is the worst of the 'Leprechaun' films. Completely concur with this, for all the previous films' many large faults they are masterpieces compared to this supposed origins/reboot story that has very fiddling point to it.
The least bad asset is the music, which did have a little atmosphere and at to the lowest degree fitted. Some of the effects were non bad, though others looked inexpensive and not used all that well.
Everything else is bad nonetheless. Whereas Davis' Leprechaun was the best thing about all the previous 'Leprechaun' films, without him the films would have been complete wastes, his absenteeism is deeply felt here as this Leprechaun was one of 'Leprechaun: Origins' worst assets. There is null entertaining nearly him, neither is at that place anything creepy, if anything he is pretty lumbering but goofy.
Others have said almost it not feeling like a 'Leprechaun' film. That is true, not but for the lack of Davis but as well it's completely humour-costless. Didn't recollect all that much of the sense of humour in the previous films, though in that location were moments, only 'Leprechaun: Origins' takes it far as well seriously and is constantly dreary and mean-spirited. The kills generally are non artistic or unsettling, in that location is admittedly no tension or suspense and the story is dizzy and wafer sparse with uneventful stretches. The characters are wearisome equally dishwater and their behaviours are abrasive, the visuals on the most office are tacky (really mostly looking worse than the previous films when strictly speaking information technology should take looked meliorate with technology having advanced by and large) and with no exception the acting is dire.
Summing up, very poor and the worst of the franchise. 2/x Bethany Cox
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Serial reboot is a generic monster flick
Warning: Spoilers
LEPRECHAUN: ORIGINS is a reboot of the long-running series made long subsequently it died a death in the early 2000s. Warwick Davis doesn't render to the titular role, instead replaced by a dwarf wrestler who is dressed up in the most generic Orc-looking costume you've ever seen. The film was shot in Canada which stands in for Ireland, and features a plot that has already been washed to death many times in the horror genre: a bunch of teenagers head out for a touristy trip, just to autumn foul of locals and local legend. This was produced by a wrestling studio with fiddling affinity for the material, but for a B-grade horror picture show information technology's non likewise bad. I liked the charismatic stereotyped villains while there's a fast footstep and plenty of bloodshed to take your mind off the inconsistencies and predictability of the story. No classic, and then, but it does the chore, just well-nigh...
0 out of 0 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not As Bad As Some Are Making it Out to Be
Leprechaun: Origins (2014)
** (out of 4)
Four friends are backpacking through Ireland when a kind sometime man (yous know what that means) tells them about a historical site they should go run across. The former man offers them a cabin in the forest to stay in for the night then that they can start walking that forenoon simply of course they terminate up being offered to a murdering leprechaun who holds the town convict.
I guess I should starting time off by saying that I establish the LEPRECHAUN series to be the worst horror franchise ever made. I really idea the get-go six movies were quite poor only being a completest I couldn't assist but check out this reboot. While this thing is certainly a lot dissimilar than the previous half-dozen films, there's no question that it'south also a little better than them. With that said, that should somewhat come equally a warning since I'grand sure fans of the original series are going to hate the changes they made here only at the aforementioned time I approximate you should at least give them credit for not simply remaking it or giving us the same matter.
If y'all're expecting an ugly little leprechaun to be going effectually telling jokes and so you're not going to detect that here. This "leprechaun" is more like a raging demons that runs and stalks his victims. I will admit that I idea these creatures were rather stupid and for the life of me I'm not sure why they were existence passed off as leprechauns. I do also admit that I recollect information technology would have been better having some sort of leprechaun that we're used to seeing. Again, there's nada wrong with the creatures hither but it seems they would take fit better into a pic not called LEPRECHAUN: ORIGINS. With that said, at that place are a couple decent kills scattered throughout the moving-picture show and at that place's no doubt that the animal itself looks adept, whenever y'all can actually see it.
The performances are actually quite skillful for a picture show like this with Stephanie Bennett, Melissa Roxburgh, Andrew Dunbar and Brendan Fletcher all doing nice work. Garry Chalk is besides good in his role. Dylan Postl plays the leprechaun here and to be honest it'south rather hard to gauge his performance since y'all hardly see his creature throughout the picture.
Again, if you're a fan of the original serial then I can come across why you might hate this affair. If yous're not a fan of horror then you'll certainly detest it. There's certainly zilch great or skilful about this movie just I found it to be mildly entertaining and thankfully it didn't run on too long.
0 out of 1 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Terrible Movie with Awful Story
The higher students and friend Sophie (Stephanie Bennett), Ben (Andrew Dunbar), Jeni (Melissa Roxburgh ) and David (Brendan Fletcher) are spending vacation traveling through Ireland. They stop in a bar in a pocket-size village in the countryside and are convinced to visit a remote expanse by the local Hamish (Garry Chalk) and his son Sean (Teach Grant) drives the group to the spot. The 2 couples spend the night in an old cabin and soon they discover that Hamish has locked them inside. Further, a Leprechaun (Dylan 'Hornswoggle' Postl) is hunting them down to feed.
"Leprechaun: Origins" is a terrible film with an atrocious story. It follows the old formulaic plot of slash movies with a group of youngsters reaching a remote area and taking stupid decisions and attacked by a animate being that kills one by one. The worst is that the invincible monster is hands defeated by a clumsy immature woman. The writer Harris Wilkinson challenges the viewers' intelligence with this story. My vote is three.
Title (Brazil): "O Duende: Every bit Origens" ("The Leprechaun: The Origins")
ix out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
THE STONES OF THE GODS
Warning: Spoilers
This Leprechaun film has naught to to do with the popular series which launched the career of Jennifer Aniston.
2 American couples on vacation in Ireland visit a remote village that has ancient stones. The locals tell them a story to entice them to stay and go a sacrifice to the leprechaun, a monstrous creature and not the likeable Warwick Davis.
The leprechaun was camera shy. Nosotros got to run across mostly glimpses. The whole story didn't brand sense as to why the villagers simply didn't kill the leprechaun with their superior fire power...or have the government do it. This tin can also double equally a cabin in the woods film. The hasty motion of the camera with people screaming, made the cinematography on the aforementioned level as the less desirable hand held shots.
Notation the hasp on the cabin door was oriented where i could remove the hasp with a screwdriver from the door frame , clearly a Hollywood hasp. Characters lacked evolution.
Parental Guide: F-bomb. No sex or nudity. No FU Lucky Charms.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Leprechaun: Origins
Alert: Spoilers
I had already seen all half dozen films in the original series, starring Warwick Davis, all being so good that they're practiced (apart from Leprechaun in Infinite, and Leprechaun in the Hood, which are just bad). This new movie, equally explained by the title, was non a continuation, only a reboot of the series, and I was confident it was not going to exist any improve. Basically, it opens with a young couple, Catherine (Emilie Ullerup) and Francois (Adam Boys), trying to escape an unseen monster. It catches and drags them both away, just before Catherine arrives at a monolith in a grassland. Some time later, four American college friends, Sophie Roberts (Stephanie Bennett), Ben (Andrew Dunbar), Jeni (Melissa Roxburgh), and David (Brendan Fletcher) are vacationing in the Irish countryside. They encounter the same monolith seen earlier, and Sophie, being a history bachelor, takes annotation of its symbol. The friends head to a local bar, where they meet with a friendly former homo, Hamish McConville (Garry Chalk), who tells them almost the history of the hamlet: it was formerly a mining hamlet where golden was obtained in a nearby cave, but when the gold ran out, the population dwindled. The four friends decide to hitch a ride to run across the cave. The friends are staying in a cabin in the wood, and during the night they begin to hear foreign noises from outside. Jeni investigates the ruckus and glimpses a figure sprinting by, and so she and the others notice that the wary Hamish and his grumpy son Sean (Teach Grant) have locked them up. A effigy suddenly enters the cottage through the fireplace and forcibly takes Jeni's gold earring. There is a brief struggle and David'due south leg is bitten by the monster, and so the four escape and race to the village hall, where they hibernate in the cellar. From a mythology book, Sophie learns that the monster is a Tuatha Dé Danann, also known as a Leprechaun (Dylan "Hornswoggle" Postl), who owns the gold that the villagers sought after. Hamish and the villagers refused to return the gold and didn't want to leave the village. In return for the gold, the villagers must sacrifice at to the lowest degree two humans each year equally "compensation". The Leprechaun lusts after aureate, but it is repelled past the symbol carved into the monolith, which serves as a barrier it cannot cantankerous. Xv years ago, in that location was another monolith symbol barrier at the leprechaun'southward cavern; but when the villagers mined information technology and took the gold, the cave collapsed, assuasive the Leprechaun to escape. The 4 friends are confronted by Hamish, who confirms that the villagers sacrifice tourists each year to avoid having to sacrifice themselves. But Sean, who has go disgusted of the many unjustified sacrifices, lets them get. Hamish escapes afterwards finding his friend Ian Joyce (Bruce Blain) impaled on some farm equipment in a shed. Later on an encounter with an old woman, Mary (Mary Blackness), revealed to exist Hamish's cohort, the four are caught and tied to trees every bit offerings for the Leprechaun. The monster arrives and rips out Jeni's golden tongue ring. David's torso is slashed as he tries to save Jeni, the rope is cut during this, allowing David to break gratuitous and release the other three before he is attacked and killed. The remaining trio head dorsum to the cottage to ready a trap to kill the monster. Only the Leprechaun tricks Sophie and Ben into hitting Jeni with their axes, killing her. Sophie and Ben fetch Hamish's truck but are cornered by the Leprechaun. The creature eventually gets hold of Ben and kills him by ripping his spine out. Though cornered by Hamish, who is nevertheless intent on sacrificing her, Sophie is saved by Sean, pushing his father into the cellar of the village hall out of guilt for the many sacrifices over the years. The Leprechaun kills Hamish in the cellar, much to Sean's devastation. Meanwhile, Sophie takes Hamish's truck and drives away until something causes her to crash. She gets out and continues to escape on foot. When the Leprechaun finds her, she distracts it with gold coins, then decapitates information technology using a machete she finds on the basis, dropped by Francois. Sophie finally manages to cross the monolith to safety, just as information technology is revealed in that location are more Leprechaun creatures. Also starring Gary Peterman every bit Irish Farmer. In that location are many negative things to be said, the Leprechaun looks more like a goblin and is non that pocket-sized, the interim and dialogue is lame, and information technology is highly predictable, the simply thing that keeps it mildly interesting is the gross violence, highlights being the accidental axe in the head and the spin ripped out of the back, only apart from that it is a pointless and rubbish horror. Pretty poor!
1 out of ii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An interesting twist to the Leprechaun franchise...
It was prissy to have a revisit to the "Leprechaun" franchise, despite this deviating quite much from the original movies.
But this divergence is non a bad affair; far from information technology. What this movie lacks in terms of one-liners, funny dialogue and Warwick Davis, this 2014 "Leprechaun: Origins" more than than make up for in brutality and ferocity.
The story is about a group of young people who are trekking in Ireland who come up beyond a small remote village that claim to have ancient artifacts that could exist rooting dorsum to the origin of the Celtic culture. But the hamlet harbors a secret that glitters similar gold, and the surrounding countryside is the home of a fauna that wants that aureate.
I will say that the storyline was practiced, despite being predictable and not really bringing anything new to the horror genre.
I thing that really bellyaching me was the camera work, especially when the leprechaun was in the shot. What was up with the constant focused view, and so out of focused view, and back to focused view. It was such a major nuisance, and it really brought downwards the overall enjoyment of the movie, virtually to the point of being equally abrasive as the 'establish footage' movies.
I didn't know that Brendan Fletcher was in this movie prior to sitting down to picket information technology, so that was a nice surprise. Garry Chalk really carried the picture show then well with his great functioning.
It was a shame that whenever the leprechaun was on the screen, then the photographic camera work turned questionable and every other frame was out of focus. From what I saw, and so there was some interesting creature design with the leprechaun. And it was a radical change in direction from the previous movies.
The movie would take been much more enjoyable if the camera work was consistent and e'er in focus. And too if they had actually shown more than of the leprechaun, then it would have been a notch up in the right direction.
v out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nosotros want Warwick!
I've yet to catch several of Warwick Davies' Leprechaun movies, but I imagine that they're not all that dissimilar to the ones that I have seen: lite-hearted horrors with the diminutive star spouting cheesy ane-liners every bit he offs his victims in artistic ways.
Leprechaun: Origins, a reboot of the series without Davies in the atomic number 82 role, does things differently, eschewing the natural language-in-cheek style in favour of straight-frontward horror, with a more than animalistic creature (played by wrestler Dylan Postl) that utters nothing but guttural growls as it tears apart its victims. With this vastly different approach, director Zach Lipovsky has managed to strip away all of the charm that made the earlier movies such fun, delivering a bland, unmemorable, mess of clichés and uninspired movie-making techniques guaranteed to diameter longtime fans of the series and newcomers alike. Nice one, Zach!
Origins' predictable plot sees a group of dumb American backpackers visiting a remote Irish hamlet where they meet problem with the locals, who endeavor to sacrifice them to the vicious leprechaun that has been terrorising the area. The majority of the script has the backpackers menaced by both the creature and the stray villagers, until only one remains (the prettiest daughter, if yous hadn't already guessed). The direction is equally unimaginative equally the writing, Lipovsky employing annoying wobbly photographic camera-work, irritating rapid editing, and gimmicky Predator-mode thermal vision, while dark cinematography and deliberately out-of-focus shots assistance to disguise the shoddy nature of the pic's generic monster.
The disappointing gore includes a divide-2d axe to the face and a poorly lit spine-ripping, while costless T&A is limited to hot final girl Sophie (Stephanie Bennett) briefly stripping to her undies—none of which adequately compensates for the sheer tedium of the storytelling and total lack of fresh ideas.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not good
Warning: Spoilers
Zach Lipovsky, who made Tasmanian Devils, Dead Rising: Watchtower, Freaks and the live action Kim Possible made this flick, which probably already had Leprechaun fans upset because Warwick Davis was gone and in his place was WWE wrestler Hornswoggle.
This version of the grapheme isn't making jokes and appears in a movie that'due south closer to Midsommar than a slasher. It really doesn't accept annihilation to do with the original films other than the proper name and the idea that information technology features leprechauns. Otherwise, it's very much its own flick.
At present, whether or non that's a good thing is up to the viewer. Information technology'south fine for what it is, simply as y'all may accept learned this week, I have no corking love for this series of films. They could make a movie in space, err, in the hood, err...look, they could make any kind of film they desire in this series and my life will be just fine. So a reboot to a less talky picayune guy doesn't make me get misty eyed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Solid if disruptive franchise entry
Hiking through the Irish gaelic countryside, a grouping of tourists encounters a group of demented locals living in a remote village offering sacrifices to a deadly leprechaun intending them to be next and must discover a way to fight off the villagers as well every bit the deadly animal.
This one isn't nigh every bit bad as its reputation. One of the strongest aspects of this 1 is the fact that there'south a lot of piece of work done here to enhance the historical connectedness of their trip with the folklore of the expanse. The film features some rather enjoyable work about the story of the Celtic origins of the area, from their stories well-nigh the past settlers and it'southward connection to the dissimilar monuments around the woods to the dissimilar measures of protecting them from the creature as it sets out to hunt them 1-by-one all manage to readily make this 1 quite overnice in that regard. Besides, there's enough of incredibly fun action to exist had throughout hither which carries this one along quite fast and frantic, with the opening stalking of the couple lost in the woods, the later scene of the grouping getting chased through the forest into the secondary cabin where not merely practice they come face-to-confront with the true intentions behind the inflow there and a pretty enjoyable ball in the woods where they're captured and prepared for the sacrifice. The ensuing fight with the beast when it appears is rather decent equally well, and the final pb-up to the brawl in the motel where it tracks them downward for its terminal big fight is a big highlight, however none of this is possible without the glorious loftier-impact activeness with them trapped in the cabin unaware of the brute stalking them exterior. Discovering their trapped within, the start hints that something is inside with them and the different means of barricading themselves away and information technology breaking through which really enhances the suspense of the situation and gives this one a ton of activity along the style. The finale does come close to the impact of this one, with the scenes of them within the truck and escaping into the forest with the creature right on them and leading into the firm ambush which is rather tense and gives this some solid action to end this off on a high- notation. Along with the fine gory kills, these here hold this one up over it's few flaws as information technology did have a few troubling bug. The moving picture'due south biggest problem is the fact that the creature never really seems consistent in its motivations. Initially it seems to be subsequently them for encroaching on its territory, then information technology goes after the franchises' storyline of the desire for golden and and then it becomes a part of the sacrificial storyline which doesn't make whatever sense and contradicts nearly of the other problems here as it never really seems to be consistent within itself. Neither of these actually brand it play that well into the franchise as well which gives information technology a rather odd feeling of existence just an ordinary creature on the loose and has nothing in common with the others so it does feel somewhat out-of- place in that regard. The other problematic expanse is the rather lousy special effects on the fauna itself, which is usually then blurry and distorted by the rapid-fire quick-cut editing that you never get any kind of view of it and tin can tell what it looks like until the cease despite it being present about of the movie. These here really elevate information technology out.
Rated R: Graphic Language and Graphic Violence.
1 out of ii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
worth watching for the effects alone, not for the Leprechaun
I never was into the Leprechaun franchise but this ane I thought I I've it a try because we don't have a talking Leprechaun but some kind of fauna, a goblin if you similar. So far and so good but what the hell was this. Pure picking in on the fable of the earlier flicks.
Just accept a look, clocking in at xc minutes, I don't think and so, the finish credit takes virtually 12 minutes. What I merely saw was pure dull, the only reason that I don't give it a 1 is the fact that the furnishings of the Leprechauns attacks are rather gory. That exactly were the coin went too. The best one is the one with the axe at the chimney. I won't spoil it but information technology'southward the all-time. Just overall, it takes almost 60 minutes earlier things go wrong, before that it'southward blah blah and ii girls looking sexy in their bedrooms. Just that doesn't make a motion-picture show.
The whole thing about the Leprechauns is pure legend, it should have staid a legend.
Gore 1,five/5 Nudity 0/5 Furnishings iii/5 Story one/5 Comedy 0/v
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Proves that if you suck everything that made previous installments of a horror franchise agreeable out for another followup, you will get an bottomless, charmless feature film
When I get-go heard an origin story of the infamous Leprechaun franchise was beingness made, I couldn't help but laugh and vocalization my opinions aloud to nobody other than myself. The one franchise that I'm nearly certain nobody wanted an origin story to had gotten an origin story, and now it makes the sixth follow-upward/sequel to the 1993 cult classic horror picture show Leprechaun. Who would've thought a motion picture about a witty, serial- killing leprechaun would've spawned six follow-ups, one of which taking place in space, 2 taking place in "the hood," and, finally, a proclaimed "reboot" twenty-one years after its release? And yous thought Freddy Kruger and Jason Voorhees wouldn't stay dead.
Leprechaun: Origins is a thoroughly odious and disrespectful film to the franchise that, yes, in some ways, does deserve respect. The original Leprechaun motion-picture show kickstarted the career of Friends actress Jennifer Aniston and provided another pint-sized serial-killer to go alongside the likes of Chucky and Tiffany from the Child'southward Play franchise. This origin story, which doesn't at all feel like an origin story, much less connected to the franchise the film is named after, does a miserable chore at non only being loyal to its franchise but merely trying to maintain plenty composure to deed as a presentable horror flick. Information technology'due south the messiest and most abysmal horror flick of 2014 thus far.
The film concerns a group of Irish backpackers, faceless and lacking in personality, like we'd wait, hiking through breathtaking Ireland. They are offered an old motel in the outskirts of the Irish gaelic woods by a group of offputting locals as a place to sleep for the night. Yet, they soon realize upon inbound the ominous cabin they are locked in and have no firsthand way of escaping. That'south when they discover a savage leprechaun lurking in the fireplace, and realize they are the leprechauns sacrifices, doomed to die by barbarous mutilation.
For the first time in the franchise'due south six motion-picture show streak, Warwick Davis does not play the leprechaun. Instead, we have Dylan "Hornswaggle" Postl of WWE fame (every bit this pic is brought to u.s. by WWE Studios) filling in his duty, merely information technology's non like that fact even matters. The original Leprechaun films, while often subpar in quality, establish a delicate residual of witty humor coming from what Davis'southward leprechaun would do and say and savage violence. He was smug, sarcastic, and would taunt his victims before ofttimes savagely murdering them. Postl is given no real dialog in the moving picture, making the titular graphic symbol not even good enough for a shred of personality or flair in his own motion-picture show. In a franchise known for its idiocy and black comedy, why this element was excluded from the alleged origin story of the character is beyond me.
However, if that was Leprechaun: Origins biggest problem, my rating would be a tad higher. The bury-sealing boom here is the mode editor Shawn Montgomery, writer Harris Wilkinson, and manager Zach Lipovsky all handle the material. For starters, Montgomery edits the film in such a sloppy and disjointed fashion that, when the leprechaun finally attacks, we can inappreciably decipher what is going on due to the fact that the pacing of the film unnaturally speeds up and the editing becomes a jumbled array of quick-cutting. We hardly even run into what the leprechaun looks like, and when we briefly practise, he is so interchangeable and then unlike in his appearance he might too be a troll, a goblin, or anything other than what he is said to exist. The editing cripples an already handcuffed moving-picture show that doesn't feel like giving its titular character any personality, much less screen-fourth dimension, its human characters any identity, or its screenplay whatever remote wit and soul. In addition, Lipovsky doesn't seem to desire to evidence whatever murders or gruesomeness on screen, which makes me question why even make a reboot or origin story to a genre that is predicated off such violence and brutality.
In add-on, for an declared origin story, Leprechaun: Origins feels distinctly mod in expect, speech, equipment, and environment. If this film really focused on the origins of the leprechaun killer, wouldn't we be seeing a film set decades in the past, focusing on the offset human interactions with such a deranged brute? It only adds to the mystery of an already baffling film that proves that if y'all suck everything that made previous installments of a horror franchise watchable and amusing out for another followup or reboot, you volition get an abysmal, charmless feature film as a result.
Starring: Dylan "Hornswaggle" Postl, Stephanie Bennett, Teach Grant, Bruce Blain, and Adam Boys. Directed by: Zach Lipovsky.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sue me...I thought information technology was okay
Warning: Spoilers
Alright now before y'all come to my dwelling with pitchforks hear me out. Its been a long time since I watched the Leprechaun Series but I loved it! It was i of the first horror series' I went through when I fell in love with the genre. It was always incredibly campy, cheesy fun and Warwick Davis was absolute perfection in the role because he was light-headed and ridiculous and notwithstanding completely deranged. Should this have been considered a reboot/remake? No. They could have called it "Dead Irish" or "Light-green Isle of Horror" and made it a whole new movie. It literally has cipher in spirit or otherwise to connect information technology to that series. So let it exist. Pretend its just some other light-headed slasher/monster moving-picture show with a low budget. When you consider that...I idea it was pretty good. Information technology has that isolation of the motel and the minor village and the deranged townspeople and a hugger-mugger they're all hiding. Its non airheaded or slapstick but dark and twisted and disturbing. I wouldn't say scary necessarily unless y'all're not used to horror films but the tone of the moving picture works for what information technology is. The cast is typical and the story predictable but what else would y'all expect from a horror moving-picture show following the recipe nosotros all know and love.
I will start with the most mundane casting selection. Dylan Postl is a WWE wrestler (WWE produced this moving picture of course) and he is headlined all over this thing. I suppose he has his fans and WWE does besides so information technology makes sense but Postl playing the Leprechaun is like Tom Cruise playing a breeze in the current of air. It could have been anyone. You don't hardly run into the monster Leprechaun (a plus in my book but hated by many) and Postl might non have even shown upward for all I know. You literally never come across the guy. The bandage of travelling twenty-somethings are decent if not typical in their various roles. Stephanie Bennett, Andrew Dunbar, Melissa Roxburgh and Brendan Fletcher all play their roles well plenty although none of them particularly stand out. You sort of become the vibe that Roxburgh is supposed to be like the "scream queen" of the movie but she never quite hits that high annotation unfortunately. Garry Chalk is very skilful (probably the best in the film) as the nice guy townsman who "helps" the kids and ends up beingness the bad guy himself. Chalk is more than evil and a improve villain than the mysterious Leprechaun. Teach Grant is also good equally Chalk's son who reluctantly goes along with Dad'southward means.
Its but a cheap little monster motion-picture show. No better no worse. If you're going to try to analyze it and concur it up to the original Leprechaun series and hold a grudge for them not bringing back Warwick Davis then of form you lot won't like it. Regardless of what they say, this is not part of the Leprechaun serial menstruum. Information technology has zippo to do with it and it isn't fifty-fifty shut to the tone of those movies. Information technology would exist like saying Nightmare on Elm Street is a remake of Fri the 13th. Aforementioned genre...very different films. And so don't get into it looking for another Leprechaun pic from that franchise. Zach Lipovsky comes from making a host of TV films and so his manner is pretty basic and cut to the chase and he makes the flick move lone nicely and he does use the setting and isolation and darkness very well. I really call up them non showing the Leprechaun was ballsy. I mean if yous build up to information technology and then disappoint completely when you finally show him (Mama anyone?) then people would complain. This fashion he remains dark twisted and a mystery. Its not a smashing movie, its simply an okay time waster than won't challenge you at all only I was entertained and indie horror films can be really awful and I didn't think this was that bad at all. seven/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
That was beyond horrendous
The leprechaun from the "Leprechaun" movies has in fact actually killed more people than Freddy Kreuger. He'south the virtually prolific serial killer in movie history that talks. The original movies were stupid and laughable, merely this one was then unwatchable information technology isn't even laughable. The basic plot is that these iv teenagers are traveling to Ireland and these two guys let them stay the night in a cabin. The leprechaun appears...and he doesn't article of clothing clothes, is the size of a normal human being, and doesn't talk. He looks more than similar a troll.
And so yeah with the championship "Leprechaun: Origins" yous'd probably look to learn about the leprechaun's origins. You know, it would be kind of prissy to see how he constantly comes dorsum to life after existence killed in every movie. This monster not only looks null like the original leprechaun, but doesn't even expect similar a leprechaun at all! This is one of the virtually platitude driven films ever created. We get a cabin in the forest, a dwindling party, sex of some kind and some monster thing. This movie was so horrendous fifty-fifty people who enjoy seeing leprechauns brutally murder people will hate information technology.
It's apparently a reboot and I estimate if the other slasher films can have one, so tin "Leprechaun". There'south ane scene where a guy has enormous slashes on his chest with blood gushing out nevertheless is somehow able to costless three people from being tied upwardly. The people who own the cabin stole the leprechaun's gold and sacrifice outsiders to information technology. Y'all would recall that a leprechaun that had his gilt stolen would desire to, you know, try to become the gilded dorsum. A dwarf played the leprechaun fifty-fifty though he was normal size so fifty-fifty that was a complete waste matter of fourth dimension. This is ane of the virtually horrible movies I've seen in my unabridged life and considering I've probably seen thousands, that's really maxim something. Zero stars
0 out of 1 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I was expecting this to be cheesy merely information technology took a more serious direction. More than of a remake of the original then a prequel.
"There'due south a lot of things about our village yous don't know well-nigh. A lot of things nosotros like to keep private." Four friends are backpacking through Ireland when they cease in a local town. The people seem friendly and offering to assist them in anyway they can. When they are staying at a cabin they begin to notice things that aren't normal. What starts off as a once in a lifetime experience becomes terrifying when they observe out the local legend is true. Fifty-fifty though this is a prequel to the original series it's non necessary to come across the others first. That said if you have seen the original ane this is pretty much a remake of that one. They hold off showing the bodily Leprechaun for equally long equally they tin can which makes information technology that much more tense. Much like the Kid's Play series the originals started off serious and concluded up being one-act and laughable (Leprechaun In Infinite and In The Hood). I was expecting this to be cheesy but they took this one in a more serious direction. I'one thousand not sure if I am disappointed in that or not. Overall, more of a remake of the original then a prequel. It was improve then I expected. I give it a B-.
3 out of seven found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I would just recommend seeing this if you lot're a diehard horror movie fan and null else is available
Warning: Spoilers
Leprechaun Origins (2014) is a picture show I recently caught on HBOMAX. The storyline focuses on ii couples backpacking through Ireland who stays at a business firm recommended by the locals. Little do they know the house is on ancient grounds that contains a pot of golden and a certain infamous protector of the gold. This movie is directed by Zach Lipovsky (Freaks and Dead Rise) and stars Stephanie Bennett (Shadowhunters), Andrew Dunbar (Pointer), Melissa Roxburgh (Star Trek Across) and Brendan Fletcher (Freddy vs Jason). The start disappointment about this movie is it isn't tied to the Leprechaun series and isn't an "origins" picture of any kind at all. They fabricated the leprechaun some Predator/Resident Evil hybrid brute and filmed his activity scenes like the spirits in the forest in Evil Dead. The concept, story and execution was annoying and disappointing. I would only recommend seeing this if you're a diehard horror movie fan and nothing else is available. I'd score this a 3-3.5/10.
0 out of 0 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No luck, here. This movie is not a pot of gold. It's a pot of shite.
Warning: Spoilers
F*** you, lucky charms! Honestly, all the Leprechaun films are pretty bad. These movies are so embarrassingly atrocious, that I actually wonder how something like this gets rebooted. Directed by Zach Lipovsky and produced by World Wrestling Entertainment AKA WWE films, Leprechaun: Origins tells, the story of a group of unsuspecting Americans backpacking, through Ireland. They soon, came across a sinister town, hiding a dark secret and a mysterious creature trying to hunt them down. Without spoiling also much, the pic has potential, but sadly, getting rid of the comedy elements was a really bad idea. This film goes for serious scary tone, instead of going for campy-horror schlock. In my opinion, this is non a film franchise to attempt do a 'legitimate' serious horror film. After all, it's about a Leprechaun for goodness sakes. I really miss, Warwick Davis as the Leprechaun. Davis had some really funny one-liners in the previous films. By not having him in this moving picture, fabricated the film, a petty more boring. It's OK that the movie focus more on the lore, but the leprechaun in this film doesn't even wait like that, likewise. They're supposed to look like fairies in Irish folklore. Virtually, usually depicted the leprechaun as a little sometime man, wearing a coat and chapeau, who partakes in mischief, only this moving picture depicted them as naked Orc similar creatures who speaks in animate being-like groans. It was a fleck disappointing considering thespian/wrestler Dylan Postl better known under his ring name Hornswoggle is known for playing a Leprechaun on TV. He does have some acting chops. If yous're a Hornswoggle fan, well, you're out of luck. He doesn't accept one line nor do you ever meet his face. He so generic in this role, he looks stupid in it. Hornswoggle is in a full prosthetic accommodate far too large for him. The fore-arms and legs are too long and you can see where it bends. The film is jarring in the way, he was shot. They effort to hide the poverty of a rubber suit by using only quick, blurry shots of the monster. Non only, is it embarrassing, it gave me a headache. Whenever the monster shows up, we can never tell what'southward going on, due to how blurry, it is. This is a major huge carmine flag. The movie is full of shaking cam, obfuscated shots, pitch dark scenes, and awkward quick cuts. It'south also funny to see that the killer cam shot has thermal vision and infrared vision as if similar to the ane in 1987'south Predator. Does that mean that the Leprechaun came from the same planet as the Predator? Anyways, all the crappy shots make the movie actually unwatchable for the most part. The only good shots of the moving-picture show is the overview shots of the lush Irish gaelic countryside. The actors playing the Irish town folks were alright, even if they playing the Irish stereotypes, mode too well. Garry chalk as Hamish is by far, the best thing, about this film. The actors playing the American backpackers were alright in their acting, only they come across as very dull. The writers, didn't the actors really given anything to stand out. Most of their dialogue is pretty dumb. A good example of this, was the line 'You lot got a pretty mouth', a 1972'south Deliverance film reference line that somehow got into an Irish movie. I know, it's supposed to represent how the backpackers felt about the local town folks, but information technology comes across, as ignorant, seeing how they're in Republic of ireland, not the Deep South. For a WWE flick, I was really shock that both well-known Irish wrestlers Dave 'Fit" Finlay & Stephen Farrelly AKA Sheamus wasn't in it. They would make this film, a trivial more than interesting. Despite being Rated R, there is lack of harsh-language, little to no gore, and no nudity. The special effects were mediocre, at best. Information technology's quite cheap looking. The movie ends with a chances of sequel. It could happen, I hope non though. This had an extremely limited theatrical run, before going onto DVD. Overall: A film you might regret watching. Completely unengaging, and not bad plenty to be funny. This franchise has gone to the deep end of the rainbow. Dirt-poor, and I sentry a lot of WWE films. Avoid. This moving-picture show is far from magically delicious.
one out of one found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Attempt equally they will , try as they might, who cheats me with a false Leprechaun won't live thru the nite.
You cant accept a poor version of Descent-like creature n phone call it a Leprechaun. Wher is the hat, clothes, shining boots north to a higher place all the rhyming jokes? Northward what's the obsession with the irritating roars/growls? The picture starts with the aforementioned ol stuff, a couple running away from something which makes irritating racket. The camera work is tedious n we dont become to c anything. Cutting the scene due north we get to c highly educated tourists who r lured into the deeper wood by a local, claiming to prove em some historical stuff. Ther is some tension northward gory stuff but the shaky cam stuff combined with the nite scenes n unnecessary loud noises every bit if some lame lion roaring, makes it an awful experience. This film own't worthy of existence chosen the origins of Leprechaun. One scene is a bit reminiscent of Anthropophagus aka Grim Reaper due north Cottage. We have one axe n some other decapitation scene merely even so a lousy film.
The original Leprechaun'due south cinematography was top notch. It was set in the dry sunlight settings north even the nite scenes were well shot simply in this case the scenes r short in the nighttime n the pov of the beast due north its noise is very very irritating. In fact the scene before the finish credit with the growl sound is unendurable. O boy, the end credit lasts for twelve mins with the cam jus lingering on subcontract tools n then zap, one time once again the horrible growl. The first three parts of Leprechaun were awesome cos of the humor.
Ther was an ol fugazi leprechaun, whose balls were fabricated of fine brass. So in stormy weather they'd clang together due north sparks wud fly out of his ass.
Endeavor as they will , effort as they might, who cheats me with a fugazi Leprechaun won't live thru the nite.
Diddley diddley dee I'thou a imitation leprechaun me.
17 out of eighteen found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Much Meliorate Than Its Reputation
The first Leprechaun picture I tin can imagine re-watching unironically. In what is undoubtedly ane of the biggest franchise departures ever, the hackneyed horror-sense of humour hybrids take been abandoned for something more mortiferous serious & darkly menacing. The monster blueprint is good, with a much more skeletal structure; I but wish it wasn't shot so incomprehensibly. Yet, with a more than-straight-faced-Cabin-in-the-Woods plot & a general cinematic care, Origins is the best still...& much improve than its reputation.
3 out of 4 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What was the signal??
Two young American couples on holiday in rural Ireland become "sacrifices" to a hideous, ancient existence. This is fake Ireland, filmed in Canada, with unconvincing Irish accents, even the vehicle registration plates look wrong. The characters are unlikable, predictable (correct downwardly to the obligatory Final Daughter), boring. The Leprechaun, when nosotros eventually exercise run into it, looks more than like some hideous alien beast. Everything nigh this picture was poor, an utter waste of time. Bring back Warwick Davis! Origins makes tha Hood instalments look like horror classics by comparison.
1 out of 2 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Inexcusably bad ...
Alarm: Spoilers
Is this picture show racist? The story involves a remote Irish hamlet full of portly, suspicious middle-aged old-earth types which is visited past a group of American friends who are young, casually confident and beautiful. It reminds me of old Universal films where Wales would be represented by a studio backlot and frequented with Americans, Scottish and comedy cockneys. The earlier films tin can be forgiven considering of their naivety, made at a time where the world wasn't quite the open up book it is now with the appearance of economy travel and the internet. 'Leprechaun: Origins' initially appears to be an practise in contrasting a 'civilised, acceptable' world where everyone is young and perfect (skilful) and a 'bottom, foreign' earth where anybody is backward, stupid and no-one is younger than 50 (bad). To use a frequently (and inaccurately) used give-and-take, I find this vaguely offensive.
'Leprechaun: Origins' is part of a series of films and is the only one not to star Warwick Davies in the titular function (the Davis films are a lot improve than this, going by reviews). It is entirely formulaic with cries of 'awesome' (when giggling at the backward locals) being replaced past 'Holy f***' (when the Leprechaun starts killing the squealing youngsters).
It's directed very nicely and lit in a manner to make the pretty people fifty-fifty prettier (at that place's conspicuously been a decent upkeep hither), fifty-fifty when in underwhelming dire straits. The leads offering nothing across some distressed pouts and some impressive screaming. One of the nearly ingenious aspects of the moving-picture show is how the Manager manages to observe ways of avoiding showing the creature – a blurry image here, glimpse of a hook or contour there; there's one amusing moment when two of the hapless leads attempt to axe the Leprechaun but succeed only in killing one of their companions instead.
Recollect, kids, don't go to Ireland if you want to stay pretty!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Weak
In the intro a couple of kids in the woods are pursued by something. It eventually catches them in the fields and pulls them away. It growls like some animal.
Then we run across 4 kids in the back of a truck. They are dropped of somewhere in Ireland. The driver refuses to take them by some rock. So they decide to walk and end upwards in some small village and become into the pub. One of them, Sophie, is going to go to grad school to write her main's on history. Hey boyfriend studies medicine. We don't larn much well-nigh the other couple other than the guy is the funny guy.
They are approached by a stranger who tells them a chip of local history since the girl is a history buff and offers to have them some place to run into the the rocks of the gods, or some such thing, which are near a mine. Even though this detour isn't on their schedule, they agree.
They meet the guy's non-and then-friendly son and they are driven to a remote cabin. Suddenly something starts making noises and goes in their management but the 2 Irish gaelic outset shooting and tell the kids information technology'due south just wild boar.
Later at dark the other daughter hears something, and like people in movies, she has got to find out what it is. And she sees a creature out there. Everybody is in a panic and the creature tries to make its style in. Now the kids realize they're locked in the house and can't escape. Of a sudden the brute is within the business firm and grabs funny guy's leg. They escape and run into a house in the area. In the cellar they observe a book that explains what the animate being is and why information technology'southward afterward them. Nosotros acquire that years ago the town's people grabbed all the golden from the mine and to appease the fauna information technology offers visitors as sacrifice. The creature here is described as both a leprechaun and a tuatha de dannan for some reason.
Now the kids will have to face up the creature and the locals and run back and forth between the motel and the house.
Leprechaun: Origins starts out alright. You get the impression that this will be a decent B-film. But things rapidly are derailed. And yes, this movie has nil to do with the series of previous movies. The movie looks good enough, the cast is alright, the girls are gorgeous, in particular Stephanie Bennett is merely adorable. There are a few gory deaths. The brute initially is intriguing just once revealed, they focus too much on its face up. One oddity is that, they style it'southward filmed, it'south never quite clear only how tall or short it is. At that place is no endeavor to show that it'south leprechaun-size, which of grade would brand information technology far less ominous than it appears in the motion picture, since it seems that all its strength is physical. This movie is adequately short at just 1:17 hours the other 13 minutes are the slowest end credits ever, interspersed with scenes from the basement, and also a huge number of crew. Not sure why a movie equally bones is this needed so many people. Information technology was a good idea to reboot this franchise, unfortunately not a whole lot of effort in placed in this entry.
0 out of 0 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Terrible reboot makes the mistake of trying to make a scary humorless leprechaun movie
Now don't get me wrong. I'm a huge fan of movies where fiddling things terrorize big things. I love everything from "Assault of the Puppet People" to "Child's Play" to the massive catalogue of Charle Band Full Moon Features exploiting this horror sub genre (i.e. "Boob Master," "Demonic Toys," "Dollman," "Gingerdead Man," etc.). What all these films accept in mutual is that they cover the applesauce of little things menacing large things, peculiarly how ridiculous it looks visually, and that is where this film fails. "Leprechaun: Origins" attempts to brand a darker more serious version of the Leprechaun story and fails miserably. Trying to sell a serious and scary story about a iii-human foot tall magical (and evil) animate being who just wants their gold comes off as only dumb. Information technology works when the filmmakers don't take themselves seriously or at charter include a wink at the audience here and there, but this film's effort to be "The Hills Have Eyes" set up in Ireland is just dumb. It'southward not to say that this horror sub-genre can't be scary. The original "Child's Play" film was incredibly suspenseful and at times scary, simply the filmmakers in that instance understood the inherit silliness of a possessed killer doll and made knowing winks to admit that fact. I remember the filmmakers on "Leprechaun: Origins" wanted to make something along the lines of "The Descent," changing the quaint folk fauna of the prior series into more of a cave monster with nighttime-vision. I will admit to chuckling when one of the heroins, right earlier shooting the leprechaun, says "F- you, Lucky Charms," although that's a line stolen right out of the original 1993 Jennifer Aniston "Leprechaun" movie. But overall, there's really no reason for this film to be unless you happen to believe that WWE professional wrestler Hornswoggle was deserving of a film career.
0 out of 0 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Leprechaun: Origins" eschews the franchise's more light-hearted, comedic roots to evangelize a generic and oftentimes dull "gritty" creature-feature.
One thought filled my caput during the rather bloodless 75-minute runtime of "Leprechaun: Origins." (I know information technology'due south technically 90 minutes, but well-nigh fifteen minutes of that is a prolonged endmost-credits sequence... and so the "picture proper" is merely about 75 minutes.)
And that thought: Why practice reboots always have to try and so darned hard to be "dark", "gritty" and "realistic"?
Recall nearly information technology... almost every reboot, remake or "re-imagining" goes out of its way to deliver a more grounded, "realistic" story. More troubled characters dripping with pathos. Shaking hand-held camera-work to hammer-dwelling the darker tone of the development. Etc.
Sure, information technology tin sometimes piece of work. Nolan's "Dark Knight" trilogy benefited greatly from its darker handling of the cloth. Simply sometimes, it but isn't warranted or necessary. And heck... sometimes it just does the opposite of what is intended or needed within the story.
This is one of those cases where the gritty reboot style merely doesn't fit in or quite piece of work.
This reboot, from WWE Studios, is a haphazard and misguided attempt to cash-in on the established cult-franchise "Leprechaun." Simply information technology completely eschews the tonality and style of the prior films. Instead of being a somewhat broad horror-comedy that never takes itself besides seriously, it instead tries to be a nighttime creature-feature thriller. And it just doesn't quite come together.
We follow a group of young travelers making their way through the Irish countryside. However, their fun trip soon becomes a nightmare when they find themselves under-siege of a vicious "leprechaun." And thus, a fight for survival begins, as they try to figure out a fashion to fight back and escape... or requite their lives trying.
I feel the need to get the about of import aspect of the film (at to the lowest degree to fans of the franchise) out of the way: This is well-nigh definitely a "Leprechaun" flick in name only. It features virtually no humor. Information technology's a radical departure tonally. The "rules" are somewhat inverse. And the titular villain is zero similar the character of prior films. He doesn't speak. He doesn't wear the classic "Leprechaun" attire. He barely even is clearly identifiable as a Leprechaun, looking more like a werewolf in mid-transformation than the archetype Irish fairy of folklore.
It feels wasted to take him played by Dylan Postl of WWE fame. Postl (Amend known by his stage-name "Hornswaggle") seemed similar an obvious choice for the re-casting of the function from original actor Warwick Davis. (Although I was opposed to the recasting, personally.) He's fairly charismatic in the ring, and his "role" in WWE was more-or-less to portray a leprechaun or leprechaun-like character. Heck, on-phase, he resembled Davis's portrayal of the graphic symbol moreso than in the film. Here, he'due south so un-recognizable and given so petty to practise from a character-stance, the role literally could have been played by whatever "little person." Information technology's wasted potential on the grandest calibration.
The balance of the cast fares slightly better, though they are given no favors past the clichéd script. Stephanie Bennett and Brendan Fletcher do their all-time as some of our leads, and come off the all-time on-screen. Particularly Fletcher, who is a wonderful, if not under-appreciated, Canadian actor.
Directorial duties are handled past Zach Lipovsky, best known as a child- actor and finalist in the reality-series "On the Lot." If I'm to exist honest, Lipovsky does an admirable enough job with what he set out to do. His visual sense is decent, and he is able to convey a visual story for the depression-budget nature of the production. Only I feel he was a little too heavy on the gritty style, and information technology cheapened the picture towards the end.
The script by Harris Wilkinson is where the film pretty much takes a nosedive into mediocrity, though. It's boring. It'due south platitude. It'due south loud. Information technology's predictable. And equally stated above, information technology has no respect for the established franchise or its fans. To be honest, every bit someone who was a fan of the original pic, the writing felt similar a big slap in the face. Why do something like this? Why make a film that will both clearly not appeal to new audiences, withal also clearly anger fans of the franchise? It makes no sense, and drags the unabridged production down. I could have forgiven a lot. I could have forgiven the cheap feeling of the direction in afterward scenes. I could take forgiven the goofy look of the leprechaun. I could take forgiven unmemorable performances. But the script just makes these issues so much worse, and it makes them nearly completely unforgivable.
I really don't know what else to say about this film. It's too irksome and generic to get in stand out from any other horror pic. Yet it'll also alienate any franchise fans. This is one of those films that has literally no appeal to anyone.
I requite it a 3 out of x, mainly because it's not a full loss, and there are a few good aspects. But it's nevertheless a poor film cheers to a terrible script that fundamentally misunderstands the franchise, and shoots itself in the human foot with clichés and predictability. If you can run across it for free, it might be worth one watch for laughs. Otherwise, avoid it like the plague.
1 out of 2 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Information technology'south not leprechaun. Its amend!
I'm not really certain why this movie gets all the hate. Its definitely not a "Leprechaun" picture. Information technology'due south a totally dissimilar experience, way more serious and for me it merely really works. Produced by WWE whose movies I tend to enjoy from The Marine to See No Evil and No One lives amongst others. There's definitely a ferocity to them I appreciate. Information technology centers on a grouping of American tourists on vacation in Ireland who are trapped in a business firm past some local townsfolk in the countryside. You see they are to be sacramental to the title creatures. What follows is a fast and tearing creature feature with some 18-carat scares, good pratical gore, surprising turns and nice dread induced but fun atmosphere. The film doesn't do annihilation new to invent the wheel but because of the solid execution they give u.s. some decently adult characters we somewhat intendance about. It all culminates in a creepy, unrelenting fashion even though it'due south a bit expected.
three.5/v
1 out of 5 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2345613/reviews
0 Response to "Dont Ever Call Me Leprechaun Again Movie"
Post a Comment